Possibly controversial but...................
Following on from an earlier blog about band names, I made a comment about a certain band that could be seen as derogatory but wasn't meant to be so.
In fact, there may be one or two musos on here that find my whole comment derogatory, but hey ho, you can't please all of the people all of the time.
Here is my comment:
"It may sound elitist or whatever, but when I was younger (teens in the 70's), I used to love bands like Free, Quo, Queen, Purple, Zeppelin, Sabbath etc.etc. but after hearing most of their songs played extremely badly over the years, I no longer want to listen to it. When I started learning bass, I used to love playing those songs, basically because that's all I could play, but as I started learning more about music, time signatures, key changes, global rhythms etc., that old stuff held no sway for me anymore. I wonder if there's any other muso's on here that can relate to what I'm trying to say."
I suppose I'm saying i've moved on, and tried to be more diverse in my playing, hence the reason I am no longer gigging because quite honestly, I would rather sit playing with myself than be subjected to playing the amount of garbage that would furnish me with a few extra beer tokens. But that's just me.
Points being, when I see the description "Classic rock band", wild horses could not drag me to their gig. But as I say "each to their own", "horses for courses", "one man's meat is another man's poison", (Mr. Mercury is testament to that) and every other cliche that one could use.
So, are there any other muso's that can relate to what I'm trying to say?
And if this blog goes tits up it's all Night Train's fault!