Are tribute bands a good or bad thing?
With a nod to a certain recent blog, I was wondering where us NWBers stand on the whole tribute band issue.
I know that a certain reptilian female on here thinks that all cover bands are 'wanna be's', so presumably then, tribute would be the worst of the lot, not only copying the music, but usually the whole look aswell.
On the other hand, Ian Anderson of Jethro Tull says that tribs are the highest form of compliment - the fact that someone likes your work so much they want to copy it and play it to other people, rather than writing their own.
Personally, I think good tribs are great for everyone concerned: the fans get to hear the music they like live on a much more regular basis than would otherwise be possible (in some case, the ONLY way possible - Led Zepp etc etc), the original band gets free advertising and possibly it's music carried to a new and wider fan base, and the band doing the trib gets to play the music they love live! Win, win, win.
If there were no tribute bands, loads of great music would cease to be played live, and surely, that would be a real shame. After all, Beethoven, Brahms and co died long ago, but that doesn't stop their music being played and even reinterpreted.
So, discuss the above in no more than 500 words, and have it on my desk for Friday - and no excuses!